|
Post by muwarrior2007 on Jul 8, 2006 21:32:51 GMT -6
So, let me get this... I post statistics that you have trouble refuting, and because one alleged MU fan "apologises for my actions," I'm a foul mouthed punk? I think it's inaccurate to say other Marquette posters, as there was only one that "apologised on my behalf." Also, I'd be interested to know what makes me foul-mouthed, while at the same time a person who clearly is homo-phobic (calls Marquette, Marqueers) gets no negative reaction, nor does one who criticizes the skin tone of a coach (whose ethnic heritage none of us are aware of). I think it's an interesting double standard. I challege you, JimmyLemke, in all of your journalistic bravado to tell me how I am foul mouthed, but these other gentlemen (and I use the term loosely) are not...
|
|
|
Post by teddyp00 on Jul 8, 2006 22:21:21 GMT -6
I for one have a very bad potty mouth. I just try to keep it off the board (most of the time) as should everyone else.
Either way this whole MU v. UWM debate is getting very old. I am starting to hope that this series does take place to that we will have something worth while to talk about regarding the two schools. Too bad that when this likely will happen I will be working in a different state. Either way I for one hope this topic gets put to bed, even though it does give me something to read day to day.
|
|
Kingsbury
Junior
Sadly, no longer in the "Fear 42" Fan Club!!!
|
Post by Kingsbury on Jul 14, 2006 9:49:40 GMT -6
I know this topic has been beaten to death and I have no doubt that Dodds has good contacts within the Marquette Brain Trust, but he posted this last night and posted a 3 for 1 deal. Now 10 hours later it's edited for a 4 for 1 deal................hmmmm. Got to love those "inside" sources. ;D mb19.scout.com/fmarquettefrm8.showMessage?topicID=12261.topic2.UWM is happy with the MU negotiations....and the opportunity to play MU...
|
|
|
Post by dylanrocks on Jul 14, 2006 10:04:13 GMT -6
I think I can say that the negotiations are ongoing and being handled almost exclusively by the two coaches. As of this posting, UWM has one date left open on its non-conference calendar.
|
|
|
Post by JimmyLemke on Jul 14, 2006 21:55:43 GMT -6
I'll take that challenge, smokey joe.
"If anything it makes sense to play you guys now b/c that jackass Pearl isn't around and spreading his snake oil salesman lies to the local media."
If you're looking for general vulgarity, jackass, you called Bruce Pearl a jackass. If you're looking for my definition of a foul mouth, I'd define a foul mouth as this:
foulmouth (noun): Mouth that expulses words that smell like utter bullsh*t.
And, by that definition, you'd be what I'd call a foulmouth.
I've also written in a former post that my nickname for you, "Marqueer," has nothing to do with sexual preference but moreso a loving term that I brand you as weird. Maybe by suggesting that I am homophobic with a vague reference to the word queer, you are showing us all what's truly on your mind.
Good day, be kind to us all, and ring outta-here-a!
|
|
|
Post by Pantherholic on Jul 15, 2006 9:11:40 GMT -6
we're not playing Marquette this year b/c we can't find a mutual date to agree upon, not b/c of our current SOS.
|
|
|
Post by crazyfred on Jul 15, 2006 10:13:49 GMT -6
we're not playing Marquette this year b/c we can't find a mutual date to agree upon, not b/c of our current SOS. Not what we're hearing. You have a tough non-conference schedule and playing MU this year is probably another loss. It will start in '07-'08....looks like you're ducking us this year.
|
|
|
Post by crazyfred on Jul 15, 2006 10:35:31 GMT -6
I know this topic has been beaten to death and I have no doubt that Dodds has good contacts within the Marquette Brain Trust, but he posted this last night and posted a 3 for 1 deal. Now 10 hours later it's edited for a 4 for 1 deal................hmmmm. Got to love those "inside" sources. ;D mb19.scout.com/fmarquettefrm8.showMessage?topicID=12261.topic2.UWM is happy with the MU negotiations....and the opportunity to play MU... Kingsbury, based on today's J/S article...looks like Dodds sources (and the ones I've been hearing for months) are dead on. 4 for 1 coming. It will be nothing less than that.
|
|
Kingsbury
Junior
Sadly, no longer in the "Fear 42" Fan Club!!!
|
Post by Kingsbury on Jul 15, 2006 11:29:42 GMT -6
Chico's, we can both agree that J/S is not the most reliable source ;D. It may end up being a 4 for 1, but I would put more faith in the deal if Jeter had made a comment about it, but he has only stated on the radio that negotiations are ongoing. It's too nice to be inside discussing this topic, I am going to do what you did last weekend and go jet skiing.
It's so damn hot today, milk was a bad choice............
|
|
|
Post by Pantherholic on Jul 15, 2006 11:57:00 GMT -6
we're not playing Marquette this year b/c we can't find a mutual date to agree upon, not b/c of our current SOS. Not what we're hearing. You have a tough non-conference schedule and playing MU this year is probably another loss. It will start in '07-'08....looks like you're ducking us this year. well i'm not going to ask you who your source is but all i'll say about mine is if they don't know what they're talking about, i'd be worried about the state of our team. i've also heard that neither AD is partaking in the negotiations either and that its pretty much between Crean/Jeter.
|
|
|
Post by muwarrior2007 on Jul 15, 2006 14:40:15 GMT -6
Well considering you use an alternate definition for your slurs against Marquette, couldn't it also be true that when I used the term jackass, I wasn't using it in the way that you took it? Could I have perhaps meant another word for donkey? Also, isn't it a trifle bit interesting that one incidence of using an the word in question would allow me to branded a "foul mouthed punk"? In general, and perhaps you should learn this before you get into the "profession" of journalism, a one time usage of an alleged profanity does not brand one foul mouthed, or perhaps in a less situation specific way, you should not use anecdotal evidence to make a blanket claim. Perhaps you should take a logic class?
|
|
|
Post by crazyfred on Jul 15, 2006 14:51:29 GMT -6
Chico's, we can both agree that J/S is not the most reliable source ;D. It may end up being a 4 for 1, but I would put more faith in the deal if Jeter had made a comment about it, but he has only stated on the radio that negotiations are ongoing. It's too nice to be inside discussing this topic, I am going to do what you did last weekend and go jet skiing. It's so damn hot today, milk was a bad choice............ Enjoy it. We went for four days up in Monterey County which we do every year with the kids. It's a horse of a waverunner where we can actually wakeboard, tube, ski, etc behind it because of the power. I agree with you, the Urinal is the Urinal but everything I'm hearing and have heard (I did work there 5 years in the department) says 4 for 1 is not going to be budged from on MU's end. Enjoy the water.
|
|