Mo State Sat 2/18/06

[gobears05]

damasa said:

milwsport said:

Apparently some people don't understand don't understand the words "could have won " and "should have won" when in the context of a BB game.

"Could have won" - was not overmatched and clearly had an opportunity to win.

"Should have won" - missed layups, didn't take care of the ball, didn't follow a clear game plan, didn't make good choices in selecting which shot to launch.

Also apparently some people don't understand the problems you face when losing your best rebounder, third leading scorer, assist leader AND his main back up for a game.

MO State doesn't suck, they are on the same level as UW-M, a high mid major, with a good team capable of competing with most of the majors on any given night.

Apparently, some people meet kettle on a regular basis.

Again, we "could have won" but I don't "should have won" should come out of any person's mouth. The Bears handled UWM from jump. They executed well, forced many turnovers and played great defense.

Oh, and they also missed many easy shots and a few from the stripe. This isn't a game of "what ifs" because if it is well than it can go both ways. If we use it both ways well then we still "could have won" but we shouldn't have.

Let's blame the refs though because apparently every time we lose it's because of the refs

I agree with this post.

I said you don't know if you play better with AT is just due to the fact you don't know if he gets into foul trouble, has an off game etc. I thought his replacement played fairly well also, was my second reason.

I'm off to the Ill. St. board, but thanks for letting me post here and good luck with the rest of the season. Perhaps I'll stop back by after you take down Cotton and Detroit. We weren't big fans of their coache's tactic's during their visit earlier this year so we'll be rooting for you for more than one reason.

[DunneDeal]

The reason the Student Section was packed was for one reason......


ESPN

cause i got there an hour before like normal, and there were alot of unfamiliar faces.

[mwu]

maybe we should tell freshmen that every game is on tv (which in a way is true with the internet feeds and all), that way the "espn crowd" become regulars like the rest of us.

[DunneDeal]

Eh...might work.

The thing is alot of games have been on TV...WMLW mind you.

We need to act like ESPN is going to cover every game...to get them I think. But, it's worth a try.

[damasa]

gobears05 said:

[quote author=damasa board=Games thread=1140190020

post=1140377040]

Apparently, some people meet kettle on a regular basis.

Again, we "could have won" but I don't "should have won" should come out of any person's mouth. The Bears handled UWM from jump. They executed well, forced many turnovers and played great defense.

Oh, and they also missed many easy shots and a few from the stripe. This isn't a game of "what ifs" because if it is well than it can go both ways. If we use it both ways well then we still "could have won" but we shouldn't have.

Let's blame the refs though because apparently every time we lose it's because of the refs

I agree with this post.

I said you don't know if you play better with AT is just due to the fact you don't know if he gets into foul trouble, has an off game etc. I thought his replacement played fairly well also, was my second reason.

I'm off to the Ill. St. board, but thanks for letting me post here and good luck with the rest of the season. Perhaps I'll stop back by after you take down Cotton and Detroit. We weren't big fans of their coache's tactic's during their visit earlier this year so we'll be rooting for you for more than one reason.[/quote]

Thanks for stopping by, come back anytime. It's always great to have classy fans on the board.