|
|
NIT
Apr 1, 2011 10:40:13 GMT -6
Post by Super King on Apr 1, 2011 10:40:13 GMT -6
You can't reward a high-major team for scheduling pig slop in their nonconference schedule, which is what Colorado did. I understand that they won some Big 12 games, but I just can't go along with rewarding that kind of unfair, entitled scheduling.
|
|
|
|
NIT
Apr 1, 2011 10:44:46 GMT -6
Post by Pounce Needs Pals on Apr 1, 2011 10:44:46 GMT -6
Colorado didn't get rewarded, they were in the NIT.
|
|
|
|
NIT
Apr 1, 2011 10:46:51 GMT -6
Post by gman2 on Apr 1, 2011 10:46:51 GMT -6
And Alabama, Colorado and Virginia Tech should have, right? Face it, with the expansion of the field to 68, there will be more teams with "soft" resumes than ever before ... every year. All 3 teams over WSU, yes. It's who you beat, not who you maybe will beat. Milwaukee beat one of the final four teams twice, once was complete domination. Why wasn't Milwaukee in the NCAA tourney?  |
|
|
|
NIT
Apr 1, 2011 10:57:05 GMT -6
Post by Pounce Needs Pals on Apr 1, 2011 10:57:05 GMT -6
All 3 teams over WSU, yes. It's who you beat, not who you maybe will beat. Milwaukee beat one of the final four teams twice, once was complete domination. Why wasn't Milwaukee in the NCAA tourney? I hope you know what I mean, bad loses for the Panthers hurt their case. |
|
|
|
NIT
Apr 1, 2011 12:45:18 GMT -6
Post by Hack on Apr 1, 2011 12:45:18 GMT -6
Milwaukee beat one of the final four teams twice, once was complete domination. Why wasn't Milwaukee in the NCAA tourney? I hope you know what I mean, bad loses for the Panthers hurt their case. Same with Colorado [/fullcircle] |
|
|
|
NIT
Apr 1, 2011 13:03:24 GMT -6
Post by Pounce Needs Pals on Apr 1, 2011 13:03:24 GMT -6
I hope you know what I mean, bad loses for the Panthers hurt their case. Same with Colorado [/fullcircle] CU had 3 games they lost over the RPI top 100. Lack of more good wins hurt CU. Non-league SOS, hurt the Buffs. |
|
