|
|
Post by Cactus Panther on Dec 9, 2021 16:35:13 GMT -6
The link contains correspondence and a document from 2017 and nothing thereafter. It does not prove or disprove the existence of an extension. 1. Please explain how you can derive from these documents whether or not there would be an extension. 2. Is there something more that you did not link? 3. What did you specifically request? 4. Can we rule out an agreement that may not be verified in an open records check? Here is the unanswered post I referenced in the "5 Years Ago Today" thread. I do not mean to imply there is an extension. You are more knowledgeable about this stuff than most of us here. I am just looking for a better understanding to know whether I can be as confident about the lack of an extension as you. |
|
