|
Post by PantherU on Feb 14, 2008 1:05:14 GMT -6
Have fun.
What are we doing?
|
|
|
Post by Pantherholic on Feb 14, 2008 11:37:13 GMT -6
Naked Free Throws - clap clap clap clap clap
If you say it loud enough, he'll hear them. It's worked before.
|
|
|
Post by Hack on Feb 14, 2008 11:45:31 GMT -6
Who's wearing the naked body suit this year?
|
|
|
Post by PantherU on Feb 14, 2008 12:25:10 GMT -6
Do we have one?
|
|
|
|
Post by uwmfutbol on Feb 14, 2008 20:24:33 GMT -6
So what's the story with the MSU players shooting FTs naked again?
|
|
|
Post by Pantherholic on Feb 14, 2008 20:58:30 GMT -6
Court rules former Rutgers players can sue over nude drill July 04, 2001 New Brunswick, N.J. (AP) – Two former Rutgers basketball players and a team manager who said they were humiliated when forced to run naked during practice can sue their former coaches. A state appellate court decision, issued Tuesday, overturned a lower court ruling that dismissed the suit brought by the players, Earl Johnson Jr. and Josh Sankes, and manager Juan Carlos Pla in 1999. The trio contended the incident was "sexually offensive" and resulted in their leaving Rutgers. The nude drill followed a free-throw shooting contest in December 1997, with the understanding that an article of clothing would be forfeited for each missed shot. The players have said they expected it would stop at undershorts. In 1999, the trio sued the school, then-coach Kevin Bannon, an assistant coach and athletic director Robert E. Mulcahy III, charging civil rights violations. Superior Court Judge Nicholas Stroumtsos Jr. dismissed the suit last year, saying the plaintiffs failed to offer any proof of humiliation, harm or that they were victims of sexual harassment. The appellate panel disagreed, saying the three men could sue Bannon and former assistant coach Tod Kowalczyk."A reasonable student athlete would find the required nudity of the strip free-throw contest and wind sprints, although brief in duration, was offensive and inappropriately invaded (the young men’s) right of privacy," the panel wrote in their ruling. The judges upheld the dismissal of the sexual harassment charge and the dismissal of any charges against Mulcahy, the school, its trustees and board of governors, university President Francis Lawrence and former Athletic Director Fred Gruninger. Bannon, who has said that participation in the game was voluntary, was not disciplined by Rutgers for the incident. He was fired in March after failing to lead the team to the NCAA tournament during his four-year tenure. Bannon could not be reached for comment, but his agent, Keith Glass, questioned the motivation for the suit. "Ultimately, this will all come out for what it is, which is not much," Glass told The Star-Ledger of Newark for Wednesday’s editions. Sankes, who said the incident caused him to develop ulcers, said he was pleased with the ruling. "I was humiliated. At the time, it was the worst time in my life," said Sankes, who led Holy Cross to the NCAA tournament this year. "I really didn’t want to play basketball anymore." www.teamarete.com/courtrule.html
|
|
|
Post by uwmfutbol on Feb 14, 2008 21:04:24 GMT -6
Ahh ok Rutgers. That's hilarious. And pathetic.
|
|
|
Post by Pantherholic on Feb 14, 2008 21:19:59 GMT -6
That's hilarious. And pathetic. That's a good description of the poor man
|
|
|
Post by PantherU on Feb 15, 2008 1:20:43 GMT -6
So holic, as newly appointed President of the poor mans coach k fan club, what do you plan to do with your new office on Saturday?
|
|