|
Post by Pounce Needs Pals on Jan 8, 2019 13:31:17 GMT -6
Wasn't Mike McCarthy 29th in offense at the 49ers. That work out well for the Packers.
|
|
|
Post by Pantherholic on Jan 8, 2019 18:05:24 GMT -6
Wasn't Mike McCarthy 29th in offense at the 49ers. That work out well for the Packers. If you think the ‘05 49ers are similar to this year’s Titans team, have fun with that!
|
|
|
Post by Pounce Needs Pals on Jan 8, 2019 18:19:49 GMT -6
Wasn't Mike McCarthy 29th in offense at the 49ers. That work out well for the Packers. If you think the ‘05 49ers are similar to this year’s Titans team, have fun with that! Well, I never said that so.....It doesn't pop in my head to answer that as I don't watch the NFL. So, nothing to have fun with. As I don't give a sh*t about the Packers. Mine was more of a question. With that said, didn't the 49ers stink? So, I'm not sure where your statement is going. I get it you don't like the hire. Your base off of one years stats is odd to say the least.
|
|
|
Post by Pantherholic on Jan 8, 2019 20:38:06 GMT -6
Well, I never said that so.....It doesn't pop in my head to answer that as I don't watch the NFL. So, nothing to have fun with. As I don't give a sh*t about the Packers. Mine was more of a question. With that said, didn't the 49ers stink? So, I'm not sure where your statement is going. I get it you don't like the hire. Your base off of one years stats is odd to say the least. Yes, SF did stink. However stinking b/c you're in year 1 of a complete team rebuild & your idiot GM/HC decides building a competent O-line for your rookie QB isn't necessary is a different kind of "stink" than taking the job of an already playoff-reaching team and finishing worse than your predecessor. As for basing off of one year's worth of stats, he's only called plays for one year so the sample size is all anyone has. In terms of not liking the hire, I'm not a Packers fan so the worse this hire is, the better.
|
|