|
|
Post by ghostofdylan on May 18, 2018 9:21:01 GMT -6
I'm fine if they want to contract the NIT and expand the NCAA to 100 teams, but leave the CIT and CBI alone. Those tournaments were MADE for programs like ours!
|
|
|
|
Post by steveisback on May 18, 2018 10:12:32 GMT -6
Only if we finish in top 3 of HL!! ha ha
|
|
|
|
Post by steveisback on May 18, 2018 10:13:28 GMT -6
Then again, some AD's speak with forked tongue!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by nickpanther on May 18, 2018 14:07:35 GMT -6
I'm fine with going to 72. this would have added teams like Middle Tennessee State and St Marys last year. I'm guessing this would mean that there would be one more 16-16 playin and 1 more atlarge pplayin, most likely. Do we call it the First 8 then?
|
|
|
|
Post by ghostofdylan on May 18, 2018 14:20:09 GMT -6
I'm fine with going to 72. this would have added teams like Middle Tennessee State and St Marys last year. I'm guessing this would mean that there would be one more 16-16 playin and 1 more atlarge pplayin, most likely. Do we call it the First 8 then? Would it have? I'm very skeptical that it would have happened that way. |
|
|
|
Post by nickpanther on May 18, 2018 14:39:54 GMT -6
I'm fine with going to 72. this would have added teams like Middle Tennessee State and St Marys last year. I'm guessing this would mean that there would be one more 16-16 playin and 1 more atlarge pplayin, most likely. Do we call it the First 8 then? Would it have? I'm very skeptical that it would have happened that way. they were the last 4 out, by the committees own admission. 4 more slots would have allowed them to be added, and meant teams like Marquette would be moved up to the Last 4 out. Would it have changed the regions? hard to say. |
|
