|
|
Post by dunzz on Mar 31, 2005 10:28:33 GMT -6
dont worry guys, me and ed threw some ideas back and forth at each other last night in the gym. i showed him a few new things . yeah , thats about it. he should be ready.
|
|
|
|
Post by nohopspanther on Mar 31, 2005 21:13:37 GMT -6
Okay, I've been watching the entire time and have not seen Ed. Did he drop-out? Nevermind, they finally show him.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hack on Mar 31, 2005 21:32:02 GMT -6
Ed's in second after first dunk ... which was strikingly similar to the Detroit dunk last year.
|
|
|
|
Post by brettpanther17 on Mar 31, 2005 21:32:18 GMT -6
after round 1 of the dunk contest ed has 52.5 and is in 2nd
|
|
|
|
Post by Hack on Mar 31, 2005 21:42:14 GMT -6
Oh no! The ball rack! ....
Couldn't do it.
|
|
|
|
Post by dtk on Mar 31, 2005 21:54:02 GMT -6
ed should of went for something a little more conservative with his 2nd dunk. with the score he had on the first he was in good position to make the semifinals really with just about any average dunk on his 2nd. oh well hindsight is always 20/20
|
|
fan
Sophomore
Don't shoot so much Tone.
|
Post by fan on Apr 1, 2005 1:04:10 GMT -6
that ball rack was inhumanely far away from the rim. If he'd have pulled it off I don't think there's any question he deserved a near 60. I don't even think its hindsight to say he should've put home an easy dunk after the first miss. Pugh in the first round saved himself by doing this. Too bad he wasn't watching the clock on the last one.
I hate when anyone over 6'6" wins this contest. mindaugas deserved the win but he had the unfair advantage of being taller and extremely long.
P.S. If he beat the #33 dunker of all time where does he end up. Also how do they rank that anyways?
|
|
Womack
Freshman
Second best is the first loser
|
Post by Womack on Apr 1, 2005 1:59:37 GMT -6
I totally agree...
That rack was damn near around the FT line
|
|
